<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dataspace &#187; Data Miners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dataspace.com/blog/tag/data-miners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dataspace.com/blog</link>
	<description>making data make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:49:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tying the BI tool to the user</title>
		<link>http://www.dataspace.com/blog/tying-the-bi-tool-to-the-user/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dataspace.com/blog/tying-the-bi-tool-to-the-user/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>btaub</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data warehousing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[747s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cessna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cessnas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Miners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Mining Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fleet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamburger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintenance Crews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mining Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olap Tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overkill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parameters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predefined Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Receivables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salespeople]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tool Vendors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dataspace.com/blog/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many organizations buy business intelligence tools that are powerful but overkill for most of their users]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, a <a title="747" href="http://lh6.google.ca/abramsv/R9zhzqtLiPI/AAAAAAAALt4/BJU4Ga_5jqY/s1600-h/pronair747b.jpg" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/lh6.google.ca/abramsv/R9zhzqtLiPI/AAAAAAAALt4/BJU4Ga_5jqY/s1600-h/pronair747b.jpg?referer=');"> 747</a> and a <a title="Cessna 152" href="http://www.flying-club-conington.co.uk/152.jpg" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.flying-club-conington.co.uk/152.jpg?referer=');">Cessna </a> can both be used to transport you from point A to point B but, isn&#8217;t the 747 a  bit of overkill for the pilot who just wants to fly himself to the next airport  for a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/$100_Hamburger" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/_100_Hamburger?referer=');">$100 hamburger</a>?   Well, in Business Intelligence (BI), many organizations buy a fleet of 747s when all they need is a few Cessnas &#8211; they  buy <a href="http://www.dataspace.com/company/technologies/">tools</a> that are powerful but overkill for most of their users.  A great  example of this is when a company buys 7,000 licenses of an expensive, powerful  OLAP tool, intending to outfit their entire staff with OLAP.  Is there a need  for advanced online analytical processing (OLAP) in the company?  Almost  certainly.  Are there 7,000 users who are going to slice and dice through their  data?  Almost certainly not.</p>
<p>You can  think about BI needs as a pyramid, small at the top and large at the bottom.  At  the very top are a few analysts who use data mining tools to identify unexpected  relationships and build predictive models by looking at huge data sets (Can you  remember when the data mining companies were looking to put mining on every  desktop?  Mining on every desktop?  Really?).</p>
<p>Just  below the data miners is another, slightly larger, layer of folks who need to  slice and dice through their data &#8211; the OLAP users.  These folks are looking for  things like what products are selling well, in what regions and by which  salespeople.</p>
<p>Next is the bulk of the pyramid &#8211; the folks in the field who are just  trying to get their jobs done.  The folks who need BI to execute specific  business processes: to see which customers receivables are over 30 days old; to  see where maintenance crews have been assigned for the week; to do the actual  day-to-day work of the company.  Do these folks need to slice and dice through  huge quantities of data?  No.  These folks generally need a set of predefined  reports which have a few flexible parameters for users to complete to specify  exactly what data to report on.</p>
<p>While  the major BI tool vendors sell their tools as allowing users to create their own  reports and to slice and dice their data, the bulk of the pyramid never uses  this capability.  Instead, when these tools are released to users they are  released with libraries of pre-configured reports.  Most users never do more than  use these reports or, occasionally, request new  ones.</p>
<p>Once  you understand this reality, you start to look at the concept of BI tool  standards quite differently.  More on this in a future  post.</p>
<p>Think you&#8217;re overbuying in BI?  <a href="mailto:btaub@dataspace.com">Drop me a line</a>.</p>
<p>&#8211;  Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dataspace.com/blog/tying-the-bi-tool-to-the-user/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
