<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Business Intelligence: Where to turn now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dataspace.com/blog/business-intelligence-where-to-turn-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dataspace.com/blog/business-intelligence-where-to-turn-now/</link>
	<description>making data make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:29:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: btaub</title>
		<link>http://www.dataspace.com/blog/business-intelligence-where-to-turn-now/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>btaub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dataspace.com/blog/?p=61#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Rich.  Like most products, the IBI stuff will work with a Microsoft environment and, probably, give you functionality above what Microsoft provides.  On the other hand, of course, it would be hard to introduce it if the organization won&#039;t step outside the Microsoft framework.

Also, I should add, if what you have right now is working for you and you don&#039;t see it limiting what you&#039;re trying to get done in the future then don&#039;t mess with it.  If the Microsoft stuff is getting you where you want to go, don&#039;t change horses unless you need to.

Anyhow, thanks for the note.  It&#039;s great to hear from you!

-- Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Rich.  Like most products, the IBI stuff will work with a Microsoft environment and, probably, give you functionality above what Microsoft provides.  On the other hand, of course, it would be hard to introduce it if the organization won&#8217;t step outside the Microsoft framework.</p>
<p>Also, I should add, if what you have right now is working for you and you don&#8217;t see it limiting what you&#8217;re trying to get done in the future then don&#8217;t mess with it.  If the Microsoft stuff is getting you where you want to go, don&#8217;t change horses unless you need to.</p>
<p>Anyhow, thanks for the note.  It&#8217;s great to hear from you!</p>
<p>&#8211; Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.dataspace.com/blog/business-intelligence-where-to-turn-now/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dataspace.com/blog/?p=61#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Hey Ben

We attended a presentation last spring from the IB folks here in GR.  They had some interesting things to show, but it didn&#039;t make a lot of sense for us since we are Microsoft clones.  Good luck with your future endeavors, hopefully they turn out well.

Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ben</p>
<p>We attended a presentation last spring from the IB folks here in GR.  They had some interesting things to show, but it didn&#8217;t make a lot of sense for us since we are Microsoft clones.  Good luck with your future endeavors, hopefully they turn out well.</p>
<p>Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
